The US President-elect says he wants to deport at least two million criminals upon taking office in January 2017:
November 13, 2016
On entering office in January, Trump said he will deport as many as three million undocumented migrants.
“What we are going to do is get the people that are criminal and have criminal records, gang members, drug dealers, where a lot of these people - probably two million, it could be even three million - we are getting them out of the country or we are going to incarcerate,” Trump said.
“But we’re getting them out of the country, they’re here illegally.”
Trump’s comments on Sunday contradicated those made by House Speaker Paul Ryan who told CNN’s ”State of the Union” that mass deportation is not a focus of Republicans right now.
“I think we should put people’s minds at ease” on mass deportation because the top priority is really border security, Ryan said.
Plans to build a wall between the US and Mexico will also be realized, Trump said, adding he would accept a fence in some places along the US southern border.
During his election campaign, Trump said vowed to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. He also has insisted he will deport all 11 million people in the country illegally, with exceptions.
Once the border is “secure,” the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement will assess the status of the remaining undocumented immigrants in the country, Trump told CBS on Sunday. http://www.dw.com/en/trump-vows-to-deport-up-to-three-million-immigrants-immediately/a-36378419
It is not likely that millions of criminals and others in the USA illegally will want to be forced out.
Notice also the following from a Muslim writer:
November 13, 2016
As votes slowly trickled in and certain states began to improbably turn red on CNN’s electoral map, the once unfathomable began to look inevitable: I would wake up on Nov. 9 as a Muslim in Donald Trump’s America. …
There were 60 million people who had made this move from Trump Tower to the White House possible. …
As promised, Donald Trump shed any semblance of “political correctness” regarding Islam and its adherents early on in his bid to “Make America Great Again.” He called for “a complete and total shutdown of Muslims” entering the country, later substituting a more palatable but ambiguous “extreme vetting” policy to quell the furor over his unconstitutional immigration ban. He topped this all by saying, “I think Islam hates us.” …
There is much work to be done. I see an ineffable force emboldening not only Muslims but many marginalized groups like Latinos, African-Americans and LGBTQ people right now. Indolence and indifference are quickly melting away. This is the point — it must be the point — where our common struggles unite and become one struggle.
At no moment before has it been this urgent and important to see ourselves in each other.
So, the 60 million who voted for Donald Trump are being blamed for his election and the Muslims wish to unite with the LGBTQ community, Latinos, and African-Americans.
Many of the protesters over the past few days have been Latinos, African-Americans, Muslims, and/or part of the LGBTQ community–though certainly not all. White Democrats, socialists, etc. have also been protesting.
Could this ever lead to civil war?
Doug Casey does not think so:
Is A Real Civil War Possible?
November 12, 2016
The Trump victory is very good news for the US – relative to a win for Hillary, which would have been an unmitigated disaster. So I’m happy he won.
Will Trump winning mean a real change in direction for the US? Unlikely. Don’t mistake Trump for a libertarian. He has all kinds of stupid notions—torture as official policy, killing families of accused terrorists, and putting on import duties. He has no grasp of economics. He’s an authoritarian. His cabinet choices, so far, are all neocons and Deep State hangers-on. He’s likely to treat the US as if it were his 100% owned corporation.
On the bright side, he has real business experience—although of the kind that sees government as a partner. …
Is a real civil war possible? Unlikely. The electorate is too degraded to actually get off their couches to fight, apart from the fact few know how to use a gun anymore. Besides, 25% of the US is on antidepressants or other psychoactive drugs; they’re too passive to want radical change. Almost half the country is on some form of the dole; they fear having their doggy dishes taken away. More than half the country is obese; fat people tend to avoid street fights. The median age in the US is 38; old people don’t usually get in fights. Anyway, everybody lives on their electronic devices, not the real world.
You’ll notice that voting for Trump and Hillary broke along cultural lines. The Republicans won the rural areas (which are dropping in population); the Democrats won the cities (which are growing). …
A real battle for the soul of the country is shaping up.But I fear it won’t be heroic, so much as sordid. The knaves versus the fools. The Dems are the evil party, but the Reps are just the stupid party. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-12/real-civil-war-possible
Does that mean that there cannot be ‘civil war’ in the USA?
No, there could be.
Furthermore, expect more terrorism. The Islamic State, which will one day not exist as it has, has threatened more of it:
November 10, 2016
Extremists celebrated President–elect Donald Trump’s stunning victory at the polls Wednesday, hoping his triumph will “lead to civil war,“ according to a jihadist monitoring group.
“Rejoice with support from Allah, and find glad tidings in the imminent demise of America at the hands of Trump,” said the al-Minbar Jihadi Media network, which is affiliated with the Islamic State, according to the U.S.-based SITE Intelligence Group.
“Trump’s win of the American presidency will bring hostility of Muslims against America as a result of his reckless actions, which show the overt and hidden hatred against them,” the al- Minbar Jihadi Media network continued. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/11/10/extremists-celebrate-donald-trump-election-win/93580822/
November 12, 2016
Trump ‘will bring an end to Islamic State’s reign of terror’ Paul Nuttall says
DONALD Trump recognises ISIS is the “real threat to human-kind” and must form a global coalition against the death cult, Paul Nuttall has claimed. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/731713/Donald-Trump-Paul-Nuttall-Islamic-State-terror-ISIS-daesh-Isil-Mosul-Iraq-Republican
I have long written that the Islamic State would cease to exist. Donald Trump will assist in the elimination of the Islamic State. The leader of the Islamic State will not get his way. Its caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, will be defeated. But even later, the USA will face terrorism (cf. (Deuteronomy 32:25; see also Why Terrorism? Is Terrorism Prophesied?).
As far as the rest goes in the USA, the cultural divides, combined with ‘professional’ political and racial agitators, often pushed on by the mainstream media, combined with an increased tendency in the past year or two for massive protests means that more civil unrest is likely.
As far as ‘professional activists go, in a story from November 12, USA Today writes an article to discredit the idea that the professional activist community is involved with organizing anti-Trump protests. USA today presents them as ordinary people. However, a news report out today says WikiLeaks exposes them as experienced protest organizers and activists. So, yes, there are ‘professionals’ who are involved in making protests.
Regularly readers of this news page realize that I have warned of more civil unrest coming to the USA for years. ‘Professional’ protesters and organizers will likely facilitate this.
Now related to the election, notice something I posted here on September 5, 2016:
For years I have warned that more civil unrest was coming to the USA. We have already seen a re-emergence of civil unrest already in 2015 and 2016.
That does not mean that I agree that globalists will necessarily trigger it etc. But the media certainly has fanned the flames in the past and I expect them to do more such fanning in the future if Donald Trump were to win.
Of course, even if Hillary Clinton wins, I still expect more unrest and riots in the future.
Notice a statement from the first and second edition of my book Hillary Clinton, Prophecy, and the Destruction of the United States:
Increased civil unrest is coming to the U.S.A. and Hillary Clinton has sometimes helped fan the flames for this and is likely to do so again.
Civil unrest is coming to the USA. (Thiel B. ‘Chaos will erupt across America in less than 100 days… no matter who wins the election’. COGwriter, September 5, 2016)
As far as the current protests, notice something I posted the morning after Donald Trump was elected:
Donald Trump has been a polarizing figure and has offended many includingminorities and Muslims. Expect civil unrest and rioting. The Bible prophesies “There shall be terror within” (Deuteronomy 32:25).
(Thiel B. How Will President-Elect Trump be Apocalyptic? Two false prophets exposed! COGwriter, November 9, 2016)
Tens of thousands have protested since that post, and some of them violently. The above warning was part of #11 in my list of 13 Ways President-Elect Trump is Apocalyptic.
Since last decade, I have warned that it was possible that the USA would be attacked under the guise of a NATO exercise. Notice something I had published in 2009:
31 And forces shall be mustered by him, and they shall defile the sanctuary fortress; then they shall take away the daily sacrifices, and place there the abomination of desolation. …
Unlike in Daniel 11:30, the King of the North meets no strong naval resistance in verse 31. This may be because he negotiated something with the U.S.A. to allow him (possibly with an “antipope,” see Chapter 10) to go to Jerusalem to broker “peace in the Middle East.” Yet, it is likely that the King of the North does things that he had not told the U.S.A. he would do (such as go after the Philadelphian Christians and interfere with Jewish practices/politics).
This may inflame the U.S.A. enough that it may be one of the reasons that the King of the North decides on a “blitzkrieg” invasion of the U.S.A. and/or its British-descended allies 30 days after stopping the daily sacrifices. The fact that the Europeans may be controlling the U.S.A.’s global positioning capabilities next decade may be enough to embolden the King.
The King of the North will probably proclaim “peace and safety” while plotting for the sudden destruction of those opposing him (1 Thessalonians 5:2–3). This would be a second false proclamation of peace. The sudden destruction is likely to include a nuclear attack, and could possibly happen in conjunction with a NATO exercise that would catch the U.S.A. and its Anglo-allies off guard (other nations are likely to also be involved).
News presenter: Bill Wedekind.